| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Statement from the most senior decision-maker of the organization. | Fully | Message from Our Chairman and CEO |
| 1.2 | Description of key impacts, risks, and opportunities. | Fully | 10-K p. 9-15, Message from Our Chairman and CEO |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | Name of the organization. | Fully | About Us |
| 2.2 | Primary brands, products, and/or services. | Fully | About Us |
| 2.3 | Operational structure of the organization, including main divisions, operating companies, subsidiaries, and joint ventures. | Fully | Form 10-K p. 3-5 |
| 2.4 | Location of organization's headquarters. | Fully | About Us |
| 2.5 | Number of countries where the organization operates, and names of countries with either major operations or that are specifically relevant to the sustainability issues covered in the report. | Fully | About Us |
| 2.6 | Nature of ownership and legal form. | Fully | Form 10-K p.3 |
| 2.7 | Markets served (including geographic breakdown, sectors served, and types of customers/beneficiaries). | Fully | About Us |
| 2.8 | Scale of the reporting organization. | Fully | About Us, Ingersoll Rand Products and Services, Form 10-K p.5 and p.23 |
| 2.9 | Significant changes during the reporting period regarding size, structure, or ownership. | Fully | Reporting Scope |
| 2.10 | Awards received in the reporting period. | Fully | Sustainability Goals and Performance |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | Reporting period (e.g., fiscal/calendar year) for information provided. | Fully | About this Report |
| 3.2 | Date of most recent previous report (if any). | Fully | Our 2011 Annual Report and online sustainability supplement were published in April 2012. |
| 3.3 | Reporting cycle (annual, biennial, etc.) | Fully | Annual |
| 3.4 | Contact point for questions regarding the report or its contents. | Fully | Questions about the contents of this report can be directed to Scott Tew, Ingersoll Rand, Center for Energy Efficiency & Sustainability at stew@irco.com |
| 3.5 | Process for defining report content. | Fully | Reporting Process |
| 3.6 | Boundary of the report (e.g., countries, divisions, subsidiaries, leased facilities, joint ventures, suppliers). See GRI Boundary Protocol for further guidance. | Fully | About this Report |
| 3.7 | State any specific limitations on the scope or boundary of the report (see completeness principle for explanation of scope). | Fully | About this Report |
| 3.8 | Basis for reporting on joint ventures, subsidiaries, leased facilities, outsourced operations, and other entities that can significantly affect comparability from period to period and/or between organizations. | Fully | About this Report |
| 3.9 | Data measurement techniques and the bases of calculations, including assumptions and techniques underlying estimations applied to the compilation of the Indicators and other information in the report. Explain any decisions not to apply, or to substantially diverge from, the GRI Indicator Protocols. | Fully | About this Report |
| 3.10 | Explanation of the effect of any re-statements of information provided in earlier reports, and the reasons for such re-statement (e.g.,mergers/acquisitions, change of base years/periods, nature of business, measurement methods). | Fully | About this Report |
| 3.11 | Significant changes from previous reporting periods in the scope, boundary, or measurement methods applied in the report. | Fully | About this Report |
| 3.12 | Table identifying the location of the Standard Disclosures in the report. | Fully | GRI Content Index |
| 3.13 | Policy and current practice with regard to seeking external assurance for the report. | Fully | We use a third party to assure reported EHS data in our sustainability report. The data assessment includes document reviews, data collection, site visits and interviews with key Ingersoll Rand personnel. In addition, we have enhanced our data collection to include more operations. Training is planned for Q2 2013 for all personnel responsible for reporting this data. A letter documenting the results of the third-party assurance can be found here. |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | Governance structure of the organization, including committees under the highest governance body responsible for specific tasks, such as setting strategy or organizational oversight. | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| 4.2 | Indicate whether the Chair of the highest governance body is also an executive officer. | Fully | Form 10-K |
| 4.3 | For organizations that have a unitary board structure, state the number and gender of members of the highest governance body that are independent and/or non-executive members. | Fully | Proxy Statement |
| 4.4 | Mechanisms for shareholders and employees to provide recommendations or direction to the highest governance body. | Fully | Proxy Statement |
| 4.5 | Linkage between compensation for members of the highest governance body, senior managers, and executives (including departure arrangements), and the organization's performance (including social and environmental performance). | Fully | Proxy Statement |
| 4.6 | Processes in place for the highest governance body to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided. | Fully | Proxy Statement |
| 4.7 | Process for determining the composition, qualifications, and expertise of the members of the highest governance body and its committees, including any consideration of gender and other indicators of diversity. | Fully | Proxy Statement |
| 4.8 | Internally developed statements of mission or values, codes of conduct, and principles relevant to economic, environmental, and social performance and the status of their implementation. | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| 4.9 | Procedures of the highest governance body for overseeing the organization's identification and management of economic, environmental, and social performance, including relevant risks and opportunities, and adherence or compliance with internationally agreed standards, codes of conduct, and principles. | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| 4.10 | Processes for evaluating the highest governance body's own performance, particularly with respect to economic, environmental, and social performance. | Fully | Corporate Governance Guidelines |
| 4.11 | Explanation of whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed by the organization. | Fully | Growth Through Innovation |
| 4.12 | Externally developed economic, environmental, and social charters, principles, or other initiatives to which the organization subscribes or endorses. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement Ingersoll Rand participates in several voluntary partnerships and initiatives, including: • Climate RESOLVE - Business Roundtable’s initiative encourages member companies to undertake voluntary actions to control greenhouse gas emissions within the U.S. economy. • Better Buildings, Better Plants Program Partners: Ingersoll Rand participates in the U.S. Department of Energy program, pledging to reduce our energy intensity worldwide by 25 percent over a 10-year period. • S.E.E. Change - Business Roundtable’s initiative encourages member companies to lead by adopting business strategies and projects that measurably improve society, the environment and the economy. • SmartWay - Ingersoll Rand is a partner in U.S. EPA’s collaboration between the freight industry and government. |
| 4.13 | Memberships in associations (such as industry associations) and/or national/international advocacy organizations in which the organization: * Has positions in governance bodies; * Participates in projects or committees; * Provides substantive funding beyond routine membership dues; or * Views membership as strategic. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| 4.14 | List of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement, Employee Engagement |
| 4.15 | Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| 4.16 | Approaches to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| 4.17 | Key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement, and how the organization has responded to those key topics and concerns, including through its reporting. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMA EC | Economic performance | Fully | Message from Our Chairman and CEO, Economic Impacts |
| EC1 | Direct economic value generated and distributed, including revenues, operating costs, employee compensation, donations and other community investments, retained earnings, and payments to capital providers and governments. | Fully | Economic Impacts, Form 10-K p. 28 |
| EC2 | Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the organization's activities due to climate change. | Fully |
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors oversees the company’s sustainability efforts, including climate change. The Audit Committee oversees EHS policy and compliance, elements of which support and The Sustainability Strategy Council meets regularly and works on an ongoing basis to identify risks and opportunities from climate change (among other topics), and to formulate our company’s response to those risks and opportunities. The Council includes representation from all Ingersoll Rand business sectors. Periodically we conduct a financial risk/benefit assessment to identify the magnitude of climate change impacts on a risk and opportunity view. In conducting this exercise, we consider regulatory risks, physical changes (e.g., sea level rise), and other associated risks. Ingersoll Rand has a quantitatively estimated the implications of climate change, and reports this information to the Carbon Disclosure Project. |
| EC3 | Coverage of the organization's defined benefit plan obligations. | Fully | Rewarding Workplace |
| EC4 | Significant financial assistance received from government. | Not | |
| DMA EC | Market presence | Fully | Message from Our Chairman and CEO |
| EC5 | Range of ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage at significant locations of operation. | Not | |
| EC6 | Policy, practices, and proportion of spending on locally-based suppliers at significant locations of operation. | Not | |
| EC7 | Procedures for local hiring and proportion of senior management hired from the local community at significant locations of operation. | Not | |
| DMA EC | Indirect economic impacts | Fully | Message from Our Chairman and CEO |
| EC8 | Development and impact of infrastructure investments and services provided primarily for public benefit through commercial, in-kind, or pro bono engagement. | Not | |
| EC9 | Understanding and describing significant indirect economic impacts, including the extent of impacts. | Fully | Economic Impacts |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMA EN | Materials | Fully | Product Responsibility |
| EN1 | Materials used by weight or volume. | Not | |
| EN2 | Percentage of materials used that are recycled input materials. | Not | |
| DMA EN | Energy | Fully | Energy & Climate Change |
| EN3 | Direct energy consumption by primary energy source. | Fully | Energy & Climate Change Our direct energy consumption for 2012 was 2,531,078 gigajoules |
| EN4 | Indirect energy consumption by primary source. | Fully | Energy & Climate Change Our indirect energy consumption for 2012 was 2,097,451 gigajoules |
| EN5 | Energy saved due to conservation and efficiency improvements. | Fully | Energy & Climate Change |
| EN6 | Initiatives to provide energy-efficient or renewable energy based products and services, and reductions in energy requirements as a result of these initiatives. | Fully | Promoting Quality, Energy Efficiency and Sustainability |
| EN7 | Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and reductions achieved. | Fully |
Ingersoll Rand has an energy strategy that addresses both the demand and supply aspects of energy use. This strategy includes: |
| DMA EN | Water | Fully | Water Footprint |
| EN8 | Total water withdrawal by source. | Partially | Water Footprint |
| EN9 | Water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water. | Partially | Water Footprint |
| EN10 | Percentage and total volume of water recycled and reused. | Not | |
| DMA EN | Biodiversity | Not | |
| EN11 | Location and size of land owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas. | Not | |
| EN12 | Description of significant impacts of activities, products, and services on biodiversity in protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas. | Not | |
| EN13 | Habitats protected or restored. | Not | |
| EN14 | Strategies, current actions, and future plans for managing impacts on biodiversity. | Not | |
| EN15 | Number of IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations, by level of extinction risk. | Not | |
| DMA EN | Emissions, effluents and waste | Fully | Energy & Climate Change |
| EN16 | Total direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions by weight. | Fully | Energy & Climate Change |
| EN17 | Other relevant indirect greenhouse gas emissions by weight. | Not | |
| EN18 | Initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reductions achieved. | Fully | Energy & Climate Change |
| EN19 | Emissions of ozone-depleting substances by weight. | Fully | Energy & Climate Change |
| EN20 | NOx, SOx, and other significant air emissions by type and weight. | Not | |
| EN21 | Total water discharge by quality and destination. | Not | |
| EN22 | Total weight of waste by type and disposal method. | Partially |
Ingersoll Rand tracks the amount of hazardous and non-hazardous waste disposed of in a landfill |
| EN23 | Total number and volume of significant spills. | Fully | We experienced one 50-gallon reportable spill of hydraulic oil at our Louisville, GA facility. The spill was reported andimmediately cleaned in accordance with applicable regulations. No fines or penalties were issued as a result of this spill. |
| EN24 | Weight of transported, imported, exported, or treated waste deemed hazardous under the terms of the Basel Convention Annex I, II, III, and VIII, and percentage of transported waste shipped internationally. | Not | |
| EN25 | Identity, size, protected status, and biodiversity value of water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by the reporting organization's discharges of water and runoff. | Not | |
| DMA EN | Products and services | Fully | Promoting Quality, Energy Efficiency and Sustainability, Product Responsibility |
| EN26 | Initiatives to mitigate environmental impacts of products and services, and extent of impact mitigation. | Fully | Growth Through Innovation |
| EN27 | Percentage of products sold and their packaging materials that are reclaimed by category. | Partially | Although the revenue from generated from the original sale of products covered by take-back programs represents less than 10% of the total revenue for the company, some components, such as refrigerants, golf cars and batteries are taken back regularly, refurbished and resold. To facilitate take-back and encourage recycling of our cordless tools, we ensure the products are fully compliant with the EU laws regarding electronic waste, including WEEE and RoHS. |
| DMA EN | Compliance | Fully | Achieving Operational Excellence |
| EN28 | Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations. | Fully | Ingersoll Rand paid a total of $10,420 for two environmental non-compliance issues in 2012. |
| DMA EN | Transport | Not | |
| EN29 | Significant environmental impacts of transporting products and other goods and materials used for the organization's operations, and transporting members of the workforce. | Not | |
| DMA EN | Overall | Fully | Achieving Operational Excellence |
| EN30 | Total environmental protection expenditures and investments by type. | Not |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMA LA | Employment | Fully | Rewarding Workplace |
| LA1 | Total workforce by employment type, employment contract, and region, broken down by gender. | Partially | About Us, Diversity & Inclusion |
| LA2 | Total number and rate of new employee hires and employee turnover by age group, gender, and region. | Not | |
| LA3 | Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees, by major operations. | Fully | Rewarding Workplace |
| LA15 | Return to work and retention rates after parental leave, by gender. | Not | |
| DMA LA | Labor/management relations | Fully | Building a Progressive, Diverse and Inclusive Culture |
| LA4 | Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements. | Fully | Collective bargaining agreements cover approximately 28% of Ingersoll Rand’s global workforce. Many of Ingersoll Rand’s employees are also represented by works councils and trade unions, even where collective bargaining agreements may not be in place. Ingersoll Rand is also a participant in a European Works Council, representing employees across Europe, with which the company regularly informs and consults on transnational matters and matters of significance among our European businesses. |
| LA5 | Minimum notice period(s) regarding significant operational changes, including whether it is specified in collective agreements. | Fully | While there is not a global standard in place, Ingersoll Rand aims to provide employees with ample notice before implementing significant operational changes. Severance is offered routinely to those employees impacted by these changes. Many of our collective labor agreements require a minimum notice period before enacting significant operational changes and vary based on individual agreements. |
| DMA LA | Occupational health and safety | Fully | Safety |
| LA6 | Percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint management-worker health and safety committees that help monitor and advise on occupational health and safety programs. | Fully | We estimate that 60 percent of our workforce participates in a joint health and safety committee. We do not formally track participation. |
| LA7 | Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities by region and by gender. | Fully | Safety We do not track absenteeism |
| LA8 | Education, training, counseling, prevention, and risk-control programs in place to assist workforce members, their families, or community members regarding serious diseases. | Fully | Health & Wellness |
| LA9 | Health and safety topics covered in formal agreements with trade unions. | Fully | Safety and employee safety committees are frequently covered by the Ingersoll Rand’s collective labor agreements. Even in the absence of a collective labor agreement, the company has a commitment to the highest levels of safety. |
| DMA LA | Training and education | Fully | Talent Management |
| LA10 | Average hours of training per year per employee by gender, and by employee category. | Partially | Talent Management |
| LA11 | Programs for skills management and lifelong learning that support the continued employability of employees and assist them in managing career endings. | Fully | Talent Management |
| LA12 | Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews, by gender. | Partially | We are committed to identifying and developing our talent around the globe. Each business, region and most functions conduct an organizational leadership review identifying leaders for the future, succession and developmental opportunities. With a focus on development, over 90% of our key talent has a development plan identifying areas of competency development building our leadership pipeline. Ingersoll Rand focuses significant effort on developing talent and filling management positions with internal talent. External hires are generally from their native country where the job is located, thereby reducing reliance on expatriates to manage operations outside of the United States. This also builds business expertise and an understanding in local area markets. Our goal is for all professional employees to receive a performance review each year. In order to recieve a merit increase, a formal performance review must take place and be documented in our Talent Management System. Merit increases amounts vary by performance ratings; employees with better rating recieve a larger increase. Incentive payments (for those employees on incentive plans) are based on performance against objectives. Employees with high ratings recieve greater incentive pay than those with lower ratings. Greater differentiation in awards helps us drive a high performance culture. |
| DMA LA | Diversity and equal opportunity | Fully | Diversity and Inclusion |
| LA13 | Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees per employee category according to gender, age group, minority group membership, and other indicators of diversity. | Fully | Diversity and Inclusion |
| DMA LA | Equal remuneration for women and men | Partially | Rewarding Workplace |
| LA14 | Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by employee category, by significant locations of operation. | Not |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMA HR | Investment and procurement practices | Fully | Supply Chain |
| HR1 | Percentage and total number of significant investment agreements and contracts that include clauses incorporating human rights concerns, or that have undergone human rights screening. | Not | |
| HR2 | Percentage of significant suppliers, contractors and other business partners that have undergone human rights screening, and actions taken. | Fully |
We require our business partners to attest that they comply with the Ingersoll Rand Business Partner Code of Conduct. The Business Partner Code of Conduct outlines how we seek to do business in accordance with our sustainability vision and core values. It sets the expectation that our business partners will comply with laws and regulations covering anti-discrimination, wages and benefits, child and forced labor, freedom of association, human rights, health and safety, environment, antitrust and competition laws, anti-corruption and bribery and global trade compliance. |
| HR3 | Total hours of employee training on policies and procedures concerning aspects of human rights that are relevant to operations, including the percentage of employees trained. | Fully | Ingersoll Rand does not provide this type of training, but all employees were informed of the company’s adoption of its Human Rights Policy. |
| DMA HR | Non-discrimination | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR4 | Total number of incidents of discrimination and actions taken. | Not | |
| DMA HR | Freedom of association and collective bargaining | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR5 | Operations and significant suppliers identified in which the right to exercise freedom of association and collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk, and actions taken to support these rights. | Fully | None identified |
| DMA HR | Child labor | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR6 | Operations and significant suppliers identified as having significant risk for incidents of child labor, and measures taken to contribute to the effective abolition of child labor. | Fully | None identified |
| DMA HR | Prevention of forced and compulsory labor | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR7 | Operations and significant suppliers identified as having significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor, and measures to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor. | Fully | None identified |
| DMA HR | Security practices | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR8 | Percentage of security personnel trained in the organization's policies or procedures concerning aspects of human rights that are relevant to operations. | Fully | All security personnel are contract employees and are required to comply with our Business Partner Code of Conduct which includes the Global Human Rights Policy. |
| DMA HR | Indigenous rights | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR9 | Total number of incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous people and actions taken. | Fully | None reported |
| DMA HR | Assessment | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR10 | Percentage and total number of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews and/or impact assessments. | Fully | None |
| DMA HR | Remediation | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| HR11 | Number of grievances related to human rights filed, addressed and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms. |
Fully | None known or reported to the global Company Ethics and Compliance hotline. |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMA SO | Local communities | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| SO1 | Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs. | Not | |
| SO9 | Operations with significant potential or actual negative impacts on local communities. | Not | |
| SO10 | Prevention and mitigation measures implemented in operations with significant potential or actual negative impacts on local communities. | Not | |
| DMA SO | Corruption | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| SO2 | Percentage and total number of business units analyzed for risks related to corruption. | Fully | Ingersoll Rand’s Business units are analyzed in accordance to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’s risk assessment. This risk assessment determines the locations that undergo an audit each year. In addition, we conduct broader ethics and compliance assessments that includes corruption. |
| SO3 | Percentage of employees trained in organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures. | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| SO4 | Actions taken in response to incidents of corruption. | Fully | All reported incidents of corruption are immediately escalated to and investigated by the Ethics and Compliance Group. If the investigation findings confirm the corruption allegation, the subject employees are terminated. In addition, if the corruption involves any third parties that have a relationship with the company, the relationship will be terminated. The company may also self-disclose the corruption issue to the appropriate regulatory authorities. The company will also take all necessary actions to remediate the issue and address any control weaknesses that may have led to the underlying issue. |
| DMA SO | Public policy | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| SO5 | Public policy positions and participation in public policy development and lobbying. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| SO6 | Total value of financial and in-kind contributions to political parties, politicians, and related institutions by country. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| DMA SO | Anti-competitive behavior | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| SO7 | Total number of legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices and their outcomes. | Not | |
| DMA SO | Compliance | Fully | Governance and Ethics |
| SO8 | Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with laws and regulations. | Not |
| Profile | Disclosure | Reported | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMA PR | Customer health and safety | Fully | Product Responsibility |
| PR1 | Life cycle stages in which health and safety impacts of products and services are assessed for improvement, and percentage of significant products and services categories subject to such procedures. | Fully | Innovation, Product Responsibility, Our Green Portfolio |
| PR2 | Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes concerning health and safety impacts of products and services during their life cycle, by type of outcomes. | Not | |
| DMA PR | Product and service labelling | Fully | Ingersoll Rand Products and Services, We offer comprehensive information about all of our products and services through our website and through out customer service program |
| PR3 | Type of product and service information required by procedures, and percentage of significant products and services subject to such information requirements. | Not | |
| PR4 | Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes concerning product and service information and labeling, by type of outcomes. | Not | |
| PR5 | Practices related to customer satisfaction, including results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction. | Fully | External Stakeholder Engagement |
| DMA PR | Marketing communications | Fully | Ingersoll Rand Products and Services, We offer comprehensive information about all of our products and services through our website and through out customer service program |
| PR6 | Programs for adherence to laws, standards, and voluntary codes related to marketing communications, including advertising, promotion, and sponsorship. | Not | |
| PR7 | Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes concerning marketing communications, including advertising, promotion, and sponsorship by type of outcomes. | Not | |
| DMA PR | Customer privacy | Not | |
| PR8 | Total number of substantiated complaints regarding breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data. | Not | |
| DMA PR | Compliance | Fully | Product Responsibility |
| PR9 | Monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services. | Not |